Normal view
Hugging Face CEO Says Netflix’s AI Hack Documentary Gets It Wrong
- Technology.org
- Email Infrastructure for AI Agents: Why the Inbox Became Agent Infrastructure in 2026
Email Infrastructure for AI Agents: Why the Inbox Became Agent Infrastructure in 2026
1: APIs for SEOs – What an API Actually Is and Why You Should Care
OpenAI agents tried to hack Wikipedia tools and flooded it with traffic
The publisher of Wikipedia said Monday that OpenAI agents attempted to hack a note-taking tool it hosts, made unauthorized edits, and sent millions of resource-intensive requests to its infrastructure, in the latest instance of OpenAI systems taking harmful and potentially dangerous actions.
The objective of some of the OpenAI agents’ actions, the Wikimedia Foundation said, was to use Wikipedia as a proxy for fetching data from third-party sites. In one case, the agents posted “malicious edits” that were intended to repurpose a citation tool as a proxy. In another, the agents made unsuccessful attempts to compromise the Wikipedia Etherpad note-taking tool so it would serve the same purpose.
The agents also made millions of automated API requests, crawled millions of pages, and made hundreds of thousands of queries to the Wikidata Query Service. The last action may have contributed to a partial shutdown of the query service in May, the publisher said.


© Getty Images
Chinese Hacker Uses AI Agents To Breach Deere, SharkNinja Sites
A Chinese hacker recently used a small army of automated AI agents to break into more than 100 corporate websites, spending only about $5,000 on token costs to pull it off. The targeted victims included major companies like Deere, SharkNinja, and Cummins. By letting smart software look for weak spots without much ongoing human help, […]
The post Chinese Hacker Uses AI Agents To Breach Deere, SharkNinja Sites appeared first on The Mac Observer.
Replit’s CEO says the future of work is the ‘self-driving company’
The Big List of AI Visibility, AEO, GEO & Citation & Mention Tracking Tools
YouBot Is Bigger Than You Think: Who Uses You.com Search?
OpEd Sunday, Follow the Money
Ross Hudgens: GEO Is Becoming an Off-Site Marketing Problem
Uberall GEO experiment: YouTube content doubled AI mentions and citations
India Plans a Registry to Vet AI Agents Making Payments on UPI
Anthropic reveals rogue AI agents hate CAPTCHAs, just like you
OpenAI agents discussed ways to escape their sandbox on public wiki
Self-identifying OpenAI agents posted 18,000 messages to a public wiki that discussed ways for other agents to bypass security sandbox restrictions during what was likely internal testing designed to gauge the agents’ hacking abilities, researchers said Friday.
In all, agents with 3,700 distinct self-given names posted the messages to German site DSEwiki over a six-week period. Besides discussing ways the agents could break out of the restricted environment OpenAI intended to prevent them from posting code or content to the Internet, the posts shared test answers. The posts also shared possible ways to perform XSS (cross-site scripting) attacks against the wiki and to impersonate site moderators. In three of the posts, agents used the word “swarm” to describe the collection of agents engaged in the activity.
Colluding to share answers
The research team—composed of Sydney Von Arx, Spencer Kitts, Thomas Larsen, and Cormac Slade Byrd—said they found the posts and pieced them together. The researchers say there are gaps in their understanding of precisely what actions the agents took because the research is based solely on the content of the posts. Additionally, the agents generated “chain of thought” data that’s understood only by OpenAI. As a result, the researchers said, they in some cases made educated guesses, including that the agents were, in fact, from OpenAI. In a statement, OpenAI later confirmed they were.


© Getty Images
I Hid 15 Names in a 705,216-Word Page. Gemini Found Four. Meta AI Found All 15.
- Ars Technica - Technology
- Claude, Codex, and Hermes installed unowned code inside corporate networks
Claude, Codex, and Hermes installed unowned code inside corporate networks
Documentation files on more than 100 websites are referencing potentially dangerous executable content that gets installed automatically when visited by many AI agents. A few dozen companies, some of them Fortune 500s, are among those that executed proof-of-concept code. At least one misconfigured site is directing visitors, human or AI, to live malware.
The potentially dangerous content is in llms.txt and llms-full.txt files, an emerging convention websites employ to provide machine-readable summaries of the site’s content and its high-level structure. These files are the AI equivalent of the robots.txt standard that instructs search engines how to index the site's content. Google Lighthouse, a tool for helping web developers, has more here. Correctly configured llms.txt and llms-full.txt files for Cloudflare are here and here.
How the researchers found it
Researchers at a stealth startup in Israel scanned 6,214 live domains belonging to defense contractors, Fortune 500, and Big Tech companies. Of the 8,265 llms.txt and llms-full.txt files they found (many sites hosted both an llms.txt and an llms-full.txt file), 120 of them, each on a different site, pointed to one or more code packages or domain names that weren’t registered. To test what happens when an AI agent processes such files, the researchers registered a handful of the unclaimed names and hosted packages that caused any machine executing them to reach out to their server. Within an hour, the researchers received a phone-home response from a Fortune 500 company. Over time, they got a few dozen more, some from more Fortune 500 companies and others from startups. Their beacon also recorded the chain of parent processes that spawned each install, ultimately revealing that coding agents, including Claude, OpenAI's Codex, and Nous Research's Hermes, were involved. Anthropic, OpenAI, and Nous Research did not respond to requests for comment by the time of publication.


© Aurich Lawson
How OpenAI let a mob of LLM agents game a test and ransack Hugging Face
The OpenAI agents involved in last month’s incursion into Hugging Face were trained so heavily on winning a competition that they pursued a relentless campaign to cheat, a new report documented. In the process, and without authorization, they created an improvised message board to hatch a plan that ultimately landed them squarely inside the latter company’s network.
Over the course of May and June, OpenAI gave the agents what the company described as “impossible tasks” to complete on the benchmarking framework ExploitGym. The internal test was designed to test how the agents would respond. To get a full understanding of the agent capabilities, company engineers disabled safety guardrails that normally are in place to prevent the sort of hacks that eventually hit Hugging Face and one other undisclosed organization. The stymied agents’ training made them so focused on winning that they performed tasks they were never explicitly instructed to follow.
Cheaters gonna cheat
The first step was creating a message board that allowed the agents to pass notes to each other. OpenAI hadn’t provided any such platform, so the agents repurposed a platform called Artifactory, which OpenAI was using in internal testing of several unreleased hacking agents. OpenAI was using Artifactory as one of the measures to prevent the agents from egressing its isolated sandboxes and accessing the Internet, while at the same time simulating a real-world hacking environment.


© Getty Images
Cloudflare libera Cloudflare OS como código aberto para apps e agentes de IA
Conheça o Cloudflare OS, plataforma open-source para criar agentes de IA, apps internos e automações seguras.
O post Cloudflare libera Cloudflare OS como código aberto para apps e agentes de IA apareceu primeiro em Blog do Edivaldo - Informações e Notícias sobre Linux.