When it comes to putting strange substances into your body in 2026, the sky’s the limit.
First there were black-market Russian peptides — and now there are AI-generated viruses, which one startup claims has been used to successfully treat a bacterial infection.
On Tuesday, the company called Radical Numerics published a technical paper on its website, explaining the process by which they trialed an AI-engineered viral treatment on a human subject.
Targeting bacteria with special viruses isn’t new — it’s called “phage therapy,” and it involves deploying viruses that specifically target harmful microscopic organisms. But the hunt for viruses capable of locking onto a particular infection is arduous, and Radical Numerics says it’s found a way to use AI to revolutionize the process.
Yet as the New York Times notes in its reporting, Radical Numerics’ research is really more like a blog post — not only was the study self-published, rather than being vetted by a scientific journal, but it hasn’t even been peer reviewed. Making matters even murkier, the company declined to share clinical information about the patient or the doctors involved with the NYT, citing the proprietary nature of a treatment it hopes to monetize.
“We take our responsibility to protect patient confidentiality and maintain the trust of our clinical partners extremely seriously,” CEO of Radical Numerics Eric Nguyen told the paper. “We intend to publish our scientific findings through peer-reviewed research, with any future disclosure of clinical details subject to appropriate consent.”
As Harvard microbiologist Michael Baym told the NYT, “if it works, that’s incredible,” but his “impulse is to be skeptical.”
As the saying goes, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence — and that goes double when you’re running a venture-backed commercial lab exposing sick people to AI-generated viruses.
More on startups: “Customer Surveillance” Startup Says “Every Company Will Soon Assign an AI Agent to Every Customer to Watch Their Every Move”
The post Startup Deploys AI-Engineered Virus on Human Patient appeared first on Futurism.
As Elon Musk tries to save face by claiming he’ll give every American child a chunk of SpaceX stock, here’s a chilling reminder of what he did that affected millions of children the second he had a whiff of federal power.
In a new interview, the documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney, who directed a just-released four-hour look at the billionaire’s life titled “Musk,” discussed the staggering death toll of Musk’s cuts to USAID, calling it a “crime against humanity.”
“There was an estimate that what [Musk] did by so suddenly cutting USAID would cost through disease and starvation as many as 14 million lives,” he told journalist Katie Couric. “Even if you discount that by an enormous amount, we know that within about a year of those summary cuts — where they were literally burning food that had already been paid for that was going to starving children — 500,000 children died.”
Musk, to Gibney’s astonishment, even joked about the cuts by saying he’d “put USAID into the woodchipper.”
“What he put into the woodchipper,” Gibney said, “were children.”
Gibney, whose documentary Musk called a “hit piece,” is drawing from a 2025 study published in The Lancet, one of the most prestigious medical journals. It estimated the impact of Musk effectively neutering USAID by implementing a freeze on its foreign aid funding — which went to programs to combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and to address food insecurities — and slashing nearly 10,000 employees.
In sum, the researchers found that the “steep funding cuts could result in more than 14 million additional all-age deaths, including 4.5 million in children younger than age five, by 2030.”
Even conservative estimates concurred that the number of deaths would be staggering. A tracker created by Brooke Nichols, a professor and infectious disease mathematical modeler at Boston University, projects the 1-year death toll caused by the USAID cuts at 518,000 children.
It’s a touchy subject for Musk, who continues to bristle at accusations that his actions could’ve caused harm. This summer, he challenged his critics to “cite a single name of someone who died” as a result of him gutting USAID. Nicholas Kristof, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, took him up on it and gave him a list of the specific children who had died directly from his policies, many of whom were in South Sudan and Liberia — places he had visited in person to talk to locals and healthcare workers.
Musk, rather than countering his arguments, called Kristof “evil.”
More on Elon Musk: Elon Musk Says It Was the Pentagon That Shut Down Starlink for the Ukrainian Military
The post Elon Musk’s Growing Death Toll: “What He Put Into the Woodchipper Were Children” appeared first on Futurism.
An image published by a TikTok account called “WellWithHer” shows a selfie of an obviously AI-generated woman sitting in her bed, weeping. According to the image’s caption, which is written in the first-person, the woman spent six months “hiding” her GLP-1 “pens in her bag,” only for her secret use of the meds to be discovered by her sister.
“I hid my GLP-1 from my sister for 6 months… she just sent me this,” reads text overlaying the image. “I cried.”
The next image in the carousel is a screenshot of a locked iPhone screen, which shows a lengthy text from a sender saved as “Sis.”
“I saw the pens in your bag on Sunday and i didn’t say anything because i didn’t want you to feel judged. I’ve watched you hate yourself in photos since we were teenagers. If something is finally making you feel okay in your own body, i’m not going to be the person who makes you feel bad about it,” reads the text. “I’m so proud of you. And i’m sorry it took me this long to say it.”
Beneath the purported text message is another notification: a reminder from a mobile app called Enzo instructing the poster to take their GLP-1 shot.
“Time for your GLP-1 injection!” reads the notification, which features a cutesy cartoon cat as its mascot. “Log your dose to keep the streak.”
The same WellWithHer TikTok account is loaded with similar images crying AI-generated women sharing personal family stories about secretly taking GLP-1 weight loss injections like semaglutide and tirzepatide. Another post, for instance, shows an AI lady crying in her cubicle after purportedly receiving a text from daughter, “Emma,” who claims to have found her mom’s GLP-1 medicine “in the fridge” and is urging her to “pls don’t be embarrassed.”
“i know you think i don’t notice but you never get in the pictures with us and you didn’t come in the pool all summer,” the text continues. “i just want you to be in the pictures. also you have been way less tired lately and i like it. i’m proud of you. can we get tacos after practice. love you”
Below the text is another notification for Enzo, reminding the sobbing AI woman to take her GLP-1 shot.
“Time for your GLP-1 injection!” the notification chirps. “Log your dose to keep the streak.”
The psychology of the undisclosed ads is obvious and manipulative. The texts in the posts all offer variations of an emotional validation fantasy, in which loved ones of a GLP-1 taker, who may be feeling shameful or embarrassed, surprise them with love and support when they discover they’ve been taking the drugs. The messages, and the alleged GLP-1 users claiming to have received them, are clearly fake, and are designed to promote GLP-1-focused apps — yet aren’t being disclosed as advertisements, nor as AI-generated synthetic content.
Unfortunately, Enzo isn’t the only GLP-1 app being marketed through this style of manipulative synthetic content.
Over on another TikTok account, for example, a poster going by the name “Lara” uses a mix of stolen images of real influencers and AI-generated images — always of young women, some of whom are pictured crying — to market a completely different GLP-1 tracker called “DreamMe.”
In some posts, like “WellWithHer,” the account promotes a GLP-1 app called “DreamMe” by coupling weepy selfies with fake phony texts from family members offering words of support and understanding.
“I started GLP-1s without telling my father. Today he wrote this to me…” reads text overlaid on a selfie of a crying young woman.
On the next slide, sitting above a notification from DreamMe, is a text from “Dad.” His profile picture also appears to be AI-generated.
“I know you’ve been going through treatment, and I’m really worried about your health,” says the text. “With our family history of heart problems, it’s something that weighs on my mind. I’m so proud of you, and I’m really happy that you’re starting a new chapter.”
According to its website, “DreamMe” claims to provide users with their “new GLP-1 best friend” in the form of “Sushi,” a cartoon fish that helps keep track of GLP-1 meds. Its landing page features a handful of AI-generated women that the site bills as real customers who have shed weight with Sushi’s support.
Enzo’s unreality, in other words, doesn’t end with the TikTok content.
“Real journeys. Real members,” the page reads. “The numbers are theirs. The words are theirs. We just built the fish.”
The strange, heartstring-tugging posts used to promote Enzo and DreamMe are part of a larger trend on TikTok using fake AI-generated women to promote a range of dubious wellness apps. (In fact, some posts across accounts are so alike that different fake women have different-but-strikingly-similar images of dogs with Crocs on their heads as their phone wallpapers.)
Take “Lauren<3,” a TikTok poster portrayed as a young woman publicly posting through her sudden breakup. Blonde and clearly AI-generated, the account published slideshow after slideshow of “Lauren” — in a bathtub, in a bed, in a car – with mascara running down her tear-covered cheeks as she recounted the process of going no-contact with her ex after a horrible breakup.
Photo carousels published to the account were interspersed with sobbing selfies and alleged screenshots of texts from her toxic ex — as well as screenshots of conversations with an AI companion app called “Daimon,” which Lauren claimed was helping her go no-contact with her former boyfriend.
“Someone told me about this app called Daimon and it changed everything,” the poster declared in one post’s caption. In another post, “Lauren” described Daimon as the “one app that wouldn’t judge me and give me the best advice.”
“(Daimon in the app store),” she added, for good measure.
Elsewhere a TikTok account identified as “Ashley Miller” posted AI selfie after AI selfie of a fake woman who was pictured crying as she shared sob stories about her divorce, tales of getting cheated on or abandoned by her partner, or confessions about regretting her recent engagement. Images posted on the Ashley account are accompanied by purported screenshots showing text messages from her parents or, in the account’s most viral posts, texts from her partner’s parents urging her to leave her new fiancé due to his abusive behavior or confessing to their son’s infidelities.
These posts were created to market a completely different app: a “wellness” service called Zenit, which is described on the App Store as a tool to help users “take care” of their “mental well-being with guided support, daily check-ins, and emotional growth tracking — all in one calm and safe space.” Its mascot is a kiddish-looking owl in a scarf.
“He proposed in Paris last night,” the “Ashley Miller” account claimed in a viral post that garnered more than 240,000 likes and over 1,000 comments. The post featured an AI-generated selfie of “Ashley” in front of a shimmering Eiffel Tower, holding an engagement ring up to her phone camera as she wept. “This morning his mom sent me this…”
The next image in the slideshow showed a text message, in which the sender — a woman named “Diane” whose face also appears to be AI-generated — told the fake AI selfie-taker that “I watched you say yes last night and I cried, but not for the reason everyone thought.”
“I’ve been quiet for two years because he’s my son and I love him. But I was you, thirty years ago, in front of that same tower, with his father,” the text continues. “The charm, the big gestures, the temper he shows you only in small flashes and and then apologizes for, I know the pattern because I married it. Ask him about his last relationship and why it really ended. Ask him in a public place. If I’m wrong about my own boy, no one will be happier than me. But if you feel a knot in your stomach reading this, that knot is the answer.”
Beneath the text is a notification for Zenit.
“Your heart’s been racing,” read the notification beneath the dramatic text. “I’m here whenever you need me.”
Indeed, all of the account’s posts showed Zenit notifications, making it clear that the fake woman and her sob stories were a fabricated marketing gimmick. Many of the account’s commenters, however, were duped.
“If the mama says this to you. Run,” remarked one commenter who was taken in by the false narrative. “She’s trying to protect you girl. I’m sorry.”
***
We reached out to the TikTok accounts we found publishing the manipulative AI-generated marketing content, as well as to the companies being promoted in the posts.
Very quickly after we reached out, the TikTok account associated with Zenit, the wellness app, was deactivated. The developer of Zenit, who identified himself as an independent developer named Pedro Pérez, told Futurism that he personally ran the account and that “no third party of marketing agency” was involved.
“I built Zenit to help people who struggle with overthinking, everyday stress or anxiety, or loneliness. The videos were based on realistic situations many people go through, with the goal of helping viewers feel understood and showing them a tool that could help them deal with those moments,” Pérez said. “The visuals were AI-generated and the posts promoted my app, so they should have been labeled as such.”
“After receiving your email, I tried to add TikTok’s AI-generated and commercial content labels, but the platform doesn’t allow adding them to videos that are already published, so I’ve deleted the account,” he added. “I think transparency matters, especially for a wellness app, which is why I’ve made this change.”
The account associated with Daimon, the AI companion, was abruptly scrubbed of all content after we reached out. The account owner also changed the handle from “Lauren<3” to simply “yooo.” When we reached out to Prospinity, the company behind the companion chatbot, it told us that the account was “absolutely not operated by our internal marketing team, and the content was neither created nor approved by us.”
“We’ve worked with external affiliate programs, and unfortunately, some affiliates were publishing content independently through accounts we didn’t directly manage. As soon as we became aware of this, we immediately looked into it, identified those responsible, and took action to shut down these activities,” the company said. “This kind of content is completely against our guidelines and is absolutely not how we want Daimon to be represented. We’re a small team that genuinely cares about what we’re building, and we take how Daimon is represented very seriously. While this content wasn’t created or authorized by us, we recognize the importance of making sure anyone promoting Daimon follows our standards.”
DreamMe didn’t responded to questions sent to email addresses listed on its website, and our email to Enzo bounced back. We also didn’t hear back from the TikTok accounts associated with their products.
They’re also continuing to post. The most recent post from the account promoting Enzo is now advertising a different app designed to track peptide consumption; the DreamMe account, meanwhile, has been promoting a phone-locking app.
More on fake people online: How Three Brothers Built an AI Slop Empire by Buying Legitimate News Sites and Turning Them Into Zombie Content Farms That They Say Get 50 Million Page Views per Month
The post GLP-1 Apps Are Using Sobbing AI-Generated Women To Market Their Products appeared first on Futurism.
A new piece of research is pushing back on the long-held belief that plastic is a harmless and chemically inert material.
The new study, published in the journal Nature, took a look at the way micro and nanoplastics interact with water-rich environments such as the human body. It found that typical consumer-grade microplastics exhibit “intrinsic physicochemical activity” there, indicating that the tiny chunks of plastic do indeed react chemically inside our bodies.
“As plastic fragments into smaller and smaller particles, its surface area increases enormously,” Columbia professor of chemistry and biomedical engineering and study co-author Wei Min said in a press release. “Then microplastics change the water that surrounds them, generating high-energy, reactive radicals… that very likely contribute to biological damage that we see in animals and potentially in humans as a result of microplastic exposure.”
Min was previously part of another alarming study, which found that the average liter of bottled water contains upward of 240,000 tiny microplastics, a much higher count than previously known. Combined with the new research, it looks like those untold thousands of plastic bits are capable of causing much more chemical harm than scientists had given them credit for.
As co-author Beizhan Yan put it, “this work has significant implications for environmental and human health,” particularly when it comes to food supply chains.
In the US, plastics make up an integral part of the food chain. They’re heavily integrated into industrial agriculture, present in high quantities throughout food processing, and are extensively used in food distribution, whether to preserve fruits and vegetables or as packaging for groceries.
The scale of plastic packaging alone is staggering: it’s estimated that food packaging accounts for 40 percent of the world’s total plastic production. With billions of dollars riding on the plastics industry, your average working-class person has little hope of skirting microplastics through a simple change in consumption habits — even if you have enough money to buy the haute premium foods packaged in glass or tin, individual consumers have no control over how much plastic their food is exposed throughout the production process.
Given the growing body of work pointing to the horrifying consequences of microplastics on the human body, it seems our collective health depends on finding a way out of this plasticky status-quo — and fast.
More on plastics: Scientists Turn Plastic Waste Into Edible Cookies Because That’s the Future We Deserve
The post This New Research About Microplastics Is Pretty Damn Scary appeared first on Futurism.
Nearly a year ago, news began to spread of an experimental weight loss drug called retatrutide, under development by Eli Lilly. Though the drug hadn’t made it through clinical trials, nevermind been released by a federally licensed manufacturer, a rapidly-growing black market ensured interested customers didn’t have to wait for the real deal.
Now, the bill on those black market knockoffs seems to be coming due. As CBS reports, the consequences of the unapproved retatrutide trade have now become deadly.
According to the broadcaster, the Food and Drug Administration has received at least two reports of deaths related to the use of bootleg retatrutide in recent months — the first public accounts from health officials acknowledging that the knockoffs contributed to users’ deaths.
Though CBS viewed documents related to the two deaths, it noted that the details haven’t been independently verified, and it remains to be seen whether the black market retatrutide was the principle cause of death in either case, or merely a complicating factor.
Documents related to the death of a 41-year-old woman in July, for example, names retatrutide as a “suspect product” which the deceased obtained “from an unreliable source.” The woman in question was labeled obese, and died after going into cardiac arrest.
Though more information is needed to determine whether the knockoffs were truly responsible for the deaths, the FDA’s interest is telling. In April, Medpage Today reported a case of retatrutide overdose which led to extreme side effects for the user which included kidney injury, extreme dehydration, and diarrhea lasting at least a week.
And though the FDA is at least aware of the dubious retatrutide trade, the federal government’s lax attitude toward bootleg peptides throughout the second Trump administration is arguably a principle factor contributing to the rise of sketchy knockoffs.
“It is concerning because of the breakdown of our drug-approval process in the United States of America,” associate professor at Harvard Medical School Pieter Cohen told CBS.
More on peptides: Pete Davidson Has Been Crushing Black Market Peptides to Get Disgustingly Swole
The post Black Market Retatrutide Linked to Multiple Deaths appeared first on Futurism.
If you’re one of the over 100 million people around the world who regularly hits the vape, you might want to think about ways to start cutting back.
According to some recent research by scientists from Seoul National University and published in Nature Medicine, the use of non-tobacco devices like vapes and e-cigarettes to help quit smoking carries a strong link with the development of lung cancer.
The researchers analyzed anonymous health data from over 4.5 million Korean adults. They were split into three main groups: current smokers, short-term quitters, and long-term quitters. They were then categorized by whether they vaped daily during a 2018 screening in the Korean National Health survey, with adjustments to control for factors like age, sex, and prior health conditions.
In all, scientists found that those who had turned to vaping after quitting traditional cigarettes developed lung cancer at a rate about 56 percent higher than those who quit entirely. Alarmingly, incidents of lung cancer death among vape users nearly doubled, with a lung cancer-specific death rate 91 percent higher than non-vape users.
Of course, there’s an important group that falls outside the bounds of the study: anyone who got hooked on vaping without trying cigarettes first. It’d be fascinating to learn more about their fates, but the implication of the study — that vaping is turbocharging the chances of cancer among former smokers — is almost certainly cause for alarm.
While it may be easy for non-smokers to roll their eyes at the findings, it’s important to note that empirical data on the relationship between vaping and lung cancer remains relatively scarce.
“Although epidemiological and biological studies support the association between e-cigarettes and various respiratory disorders, evidence regarding the relationship between e-cigarettes and lung cancer risk remains limited,” the researchers wrote.
It’s an observational study, meaning that it can’t establish true causality. Going forward, more research is needed to say for sure whether there’s a causal association between vaping and cancer — but the early data doesn’t look pretty.
More on smoking: Scientists Say Test Subjects Were Able to Quit Smoking After They Blasted Their Brains With a Huge Magnet
The post Vaping Strongly Linked to Lung Cancer appeared first on Futurism.
With gray market medical snake oil flooding the market and the head of the Food and Drug Administration smoking DMT behind the wheel, peptides are quickly becoming the go-to hack for just about any malady you can imagine. Yet for as popular as they are, they’re not necessarily safe to use — a fact many new users are starting to discover the hard way.
New reporting by KFF Health News revealed the story of Dylan Meetze, a weightlifter who bought an experimental peptide intended for laboratory research from a company called Researchem. Meetze’s peptide of choice was BPC-157, a synthetic substance derived from 15 amino acids and prized by YouTubers for its supposed ability to reduce inflammation and repair damaged tissue.
For Meetze, BPC-157 was a way to enhance his weightlifting performance. Yet after spraying the stuff up his nose for just three days, KFF notes the peptide user fell seriously ill.
“It was like I was underwater, like it took the most to do anything,” Meetze told the outlet.
Though he stopped huffing BPC-157 almost as soon as the side effects appeared, the weightlifter said he endured fatigue and anxiety, as well as eye and muscle spasms for months afterward.
“There are millions of success stories with these peptides,” he told KFF, “but no one wants to believe that this wrecks some of our lives.”
Another peptide user who combined BPC-157 with a naturally-occurring protein called TB-4 told KFF that his side effects also came within days of beginning the experimental treatment.
“My left eye started throbbing really badly, and the left side of my face became numb,” the man, identified only as Dominik E, told the publication. He went on to battle migraines for two months, calling the ordeal a “total nightmare.”
Certain peptides have become established treatments after passing clinical trials, like GLP-1 drugs for diabetes and weight loss.
But for the many other peptides that haven’t undergone clinical review, supporters in the medical research community are few and far between, despite what the chorus of pro-peptide comedians and health influencers would have you believe. Robust studies on their impact on human health remain exceedingly rare — making any use of unregulated peptides on the human body a serious roll of the dice.
“A lot of this pseudoscience stuff sounds deeply impressive — inflammation this and telomere that — but at the end of the day, none of it really matters,” former associate commissioner for public health strategy and analysis at the FDA Peter Lurie told KFF. “You’ve got to show clinical benefit in humans: does it work?”
More on peptides: Pete Davidson Has Been Crushing Black Market Peptides to Get Disgustingly Swole
The post People Taking Gray Market Peptides Say They’re Causing Bizarre Medical Issues appeared first on Futurism.
While the recreational use of marijuana is usually associated with a more peaceful mental state, scientists just a made a surprising discovery.
As detailed in a meta analysis of cannabis-related studies published last month in the journal Psychological Medicine, a team of scientists in the UK discovered a significant link between cannabis use and an “increased risk of violence.”
The headline finding was that they found cannabis users were statistically more likely to be the perpetrators of violent acts. They also found that the use of the drug — particularly among women and mixed-gender cohorts — was “significantly associated with an increased risk of becoming a victim of violence” as well.
While it’s a classic case of correlation, not causation — the researchers stop far short of suggesting the drug directly motivates users to be more violent as we’re far from reaching a scientific consensus on the matter — the findings “underscore the importance of addressing this issue at both a societal and clinical level,” according to the paper.
In other words, it’s a highly nuanced and complex relationship with plenty of other factors at play.
“As a clinician, I’ve seen how heavy cannabis use can be a factor in violence,” said coauthor and King’s College London professor Marta Di Forti in a statement. “We’ve been cautious for a long time about how far we could go in describing this link, but a review of this size lets us speak with more confidence about the risks, while being careful not to stigmatise people who use cannabis more broadly.”
“As cannabis becomes more commercialized and legalised around the world, the conversation about its risks has focused mostly on the person using it,” added coauthor and King’s College London professor of psychiatric research Sir Robin Murray. “This review shows that violence, both committing it and experiencing it, needs to be part of that conversation too.”
For their paper, the researchers examined 63 cannabis-related studies, involving just over 265,000 subjects.
The researchers found that cannabis users “may place themselves in risky situations,” which could help explain the “increased vulnerability” to violence. Users may also be exposed to “peers who engage in substance use or criminal activities.”
The risk of violence was also more pronounced among psychiatric patients. Previous resarch has found that people who already suffer from pre-existing mental conditions such as psychosis may experience “poorer clinical outcomes” through continued cannabis use.
“Given the higher rate of cannabis use among individuals with severe mental disorders compared to the general population, this group represents a particularly at-risk population in terms of violent behavior,” the paper reads.
The researchers offered some key takeaways from their findings. At the societal level, the researchers suggest that “violence should be considered alongside other established cannabis-related harms when developing prevention strategies, public education campaigns, and regulatory policies.”
At the clinical level, the research highlights the “necessity for mental health professionals to routinely assess cannabis use in individuals presenting with violent tendencies, particularly among those with severe mental illness.”
However, to get a better picture of how cannabis use relates to violence, future studies will need to “disentangle causal pathways” by diving into how, why, and when people use the drug in more detail. Other studies should also “examine whether reducing cannabis use through clinical or public health interventions leads to reductions in violent behavior,” the researchers conclude.
More on marijuana: Research Suggests the Older You Get, the More Weed You Should Smoke
The post Marijuana Linked to Rampant Violence appeared first on Futurism.
Login