❌

Normal view

Perplexity Computer agora pode rodar 100% offline no Mac

20 October 2026 at 18:58

No mês passado, falamos sobre o Hybrid Compute, uma ferramenta do app da Perplexity que permite dividir uma tarefa entre um modelo de ponta baseado na nuvem e um LLM 1Large language models, ou grandes modelos de linguagem. executado no Mac.

Hoje, a companhia de inteligência artificial anunciou uma outra novidade nessa linha: um modo totalmente local que elimina qualquer dependência do Computer de modelos na nuvem e possibilita sessões de trabalho 100% offline.

Perplexity Computer can now run fully local on your Mac.

Work with your native Mac apps and local files, and run tasks without sending sensitive data to the cloud. The model and the agent both run on your Mac.

Available now in the Perplexity Mac app. pic.twitter.com/tnvCgCXD7v

— Perplexity (@perplexity_ai) October 20, 2026

Quando ativado, esse modo processa localmente, no seu computador, tanto o modelo de IA quanto o agente, o que inclui tarefas como planejamento, raciocínio e processamento de arquivos (que só são enviados para a nuvem com a devida permissão, caso o usuário opte por isso).

Caso o usuário conceda os acessos necessários, o Perplexity Computer pode trabalhar com arquivos locais e apps suportados no Mac, como o Notas (Notes), o Mensagens (Messages), o Mail e o Numbers.

Segundo a Perplexity, esse novo modo está disponível para assinantes dos planos Pro, Max e Enterprise, os quais podem baixar e configurar os modelos Qwen 3.6 e PPLX Pro. Para isso, porém, é necessário ter um Mac com Apple Silicon e pelo menos 36GB de memória unificada.

via 9to5Mac

Notas de rodapé

  • 1
    Large language models, ou grandes modelos de linguagem.

Keynote 15.4, Numbers 15.4, and Pages 15.4

2 October 2026 at 21:29
Keynote 5 icon
Updates Numbers with a lengthy list of new trigonometry, statistics, and logic functions. ($129.99 annual Apple Creator Studio subscription, various sizes, macOS 26+)

macOS Hidden Treasures: Typing Exotic Characters

MacVoices #26187: Road to Macstock – Allison Sheridan

By: Chuck
22 June 2026 at 14:53
On the Road to Macstock, Allison Sheridan previews her session that features a hands-on spreadsheet workshop comparing Excel, Numbers, and Google Sheets. She explains practical skills like fill-down, fill-right, and possibly pivot tables, while stressing that the goal is not exhaustive training but confidence-building. Our conversation also touches on Copilot i relation to Excel, vibe coding, and why Macstock feels like coming home.

💾

MacVoices #26152: Live! – Apple Vision Pro Backlash, Bartender is Back, and Apple Productivity App Changes

By: Chuck
25 May 2026 at 18:42
The MacVoices Live! panel examines backlash around Apple rumor reporting, especially Vision Pro speculation and the impact of click-driven headlines on developers and readers. Chuck Joiner, David Ginsburg, Marty Jencius, Eric Bolden, Brian Flanigan-Arthurs, Jeff Gamet and Mark Fuccio then turn to Bartender’s return after past trust concerns, alternatives for menu bar management, and whether […]

💾

Keynote 15.3, Numbers 15.3, and Pages 15.3

6 July 2026 at 18:07
Keynote 5 icon
Enables direct image editing in Pixelmator Pro for Apple Creator Studio subscribers. ($129.99 annual Apple Creator Studio subscription, various sizes, macOS 15.6+)

macOS Hidden Treasures: Typing Exotic Characters

Fixing Things Which Can Go Wrong With Complex Numbers

By: PAllen
20 July 2025 at 12:55
Abstract This article will build on the hints about treating the complex numbers as a branched surface, briefly described and pictured in section 4.2 of https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/views-on-complex-numbers/#The-Radish. Using a particular set of conventions, all the problems described in https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/things-can-go-wrong-complex-numbers/  can be removed, and the rules described there as applying only to reals generalized to complex numbers. A...

Views On Complex Numbers

7 June 2024 at 12:10
Abstract Why do we need yet another article about complex numbers? This is a valid question and I have asked it myself. I could mention that I wanted to gather the many different views that can be found elsewhere – Euler’s and Gauß’s perspectives, i.e. various historical views in the light of the traditionally parallel...
❌